|
|
||||||||
Neural Computation, Vol 9, 1245-1249, Copyright © 1997 by The MIT Press
NOTES |
Cyril Goutte
The 'no-free-lunch' theorems (Wolpert & Macready, 1995) have sparked heated debate in the computational learning community. A recent communication (Zhu & Rohwer, 1996) attempts to demonstrate the inefficiency of cross-validation on a simple problem. We elaborate on this result by considering a broader class of cross-validation. When used more strictly, cross-validation can yield the expected results on simple examples.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Giessing, G. R. Fink, F. Rosler, and C. M. Thiel FMRI data predict individual differences of behavioral effects of nicotine: a partial least square analysis. J. Cogn. Neurosci., April 1, 2007; 19(4): 658 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Chen and S. Haykin On Different Facets of Regularization Theory Neural Comput., December 1, 2002; 14(12): 2791 - 2846. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
I. Rivals and L. Personnaz On Cross Validation for Model Selection Neural Comput., May 15, 1999; 11(4): 863 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE | NEURAL COMPUTATION | MIT PRESS JOURNALS |