Neural Comp. Sign up for ETOCS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Halchenko, Y. O.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Halchenko, Y. O.
(Neural Computation. 2008;20:486-503.)
© 2008 The MIT Press


Letter

Brain Reading Using Full Brain Support Vector Machines for Object Recognition: There Is No "Face" Identification Area

Stephen José Hanson

jose{at}tractatus.rutgers.edu Rutgers Mind/Brain Analysis Laboratories, Psychology Department, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, U.S.A.

Yaroslav O. Halchenko

yoh{at}psychology.rutgers.edu Rutgers Mind/Brain Analysis Laboratories, Psychology Department, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, U.S.A.

Over the past decade, object recognition work has confounded voxel response detection with potential voxel class identification. Consequently, the claim that there are areas of the brain that are necessary and sufficient for object identification cannot be resolved with existing associative methods (e.g., the general linear model) that are dominant in brain imaging methods. In order to explore this controversy we trained full brain (40,000 voxels) single TR (repetition time) classifiers on data from 10 subjects in two different recognition tasks on the most controversial classes of stimuli (house and face) and show 97.4% median out-of-sample (unseen TRs) generalization. This performance allowed us to reliably and uniquely assay the classifier's voxel diagnosticity in all individual subjects' brains. In this two-class case, there may be specific areas diagnostic for house stimuli (e.g., LO) or for face stimuli (e.g., STS); however, in contrast to the detection results common in this literature, neither the fusiform face area nor parahippocampal place area is shown to be uniquely diagnostic for faces or places, respectively.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by The MIT Press.