Neural Comp. NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeong, H. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Gutkin, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jeong, H. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Gutkin, B.
(Neural Computation. 2007;19:706-729.)
© 2007 The MIT Press


Letter

Synchrony of Neuronal Oscillations Controlled by GABAergic Reversal Potentials

Ho Young Jeong

jeonghy{at}cns.nyu.edu Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, U.S.A.

Boris Gutkin

boris.gutkin{at}ens.fr Group for Neural Theory, DEC, ENS-Paris; Collége de France, and URA 2169 Recepteurs et Cognition, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

GABAergic synapse reversal potential is controlled by the concentration of chloride. This concentration can change significantly during development and as a function of neuronal activity. Thus, GABA inhibition can be hyperpolarizing, shunting, or partially depolarizing. Previous results pinpointed the conditions under which hyperpolarizing inhibition (or depolarizing excitation) can lead to synchrony of neural oscillators. Here we examine the role of the GABAergic reversal potential in generation of synchronous oscillations in circuits of neural oscillators. Using weakly coupled oscillator analysis, we show when shunting and partially depolarizing inhibition can produce synchrony, asynchrony, and coexistence of the two. In particular, we show that this depends critically on such factors as the firing rate, the speed of the synapse, spike frequency adaptation, and, most important, the dynamics of spike generation (type I versus type II). We back up our analysis with simulations of small circuits of conductance-based neurons, as well as large-scale networks of neural oscillators. The simulation results are compatible with the analysis: for example, when bistability is predicted analytically, the large-scale network shows clustered states.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by The MIT Press.