Neural Comp. Sign up for ETOCS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Polavieja, G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Polavieja, G. G.
(Neural Computation. 2006;18:2102-2121.)
© 2006 The MIT Press


Letter

Neuronal Algorithms That Detect the Temporal Order of Events

Gonzalo G. de Polavieja

gonzalo.polavieja{at}uam.es Neural Processing Laboratory, Instituto "Nicolas Cabrera" and Department of Theoretical Physics, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid 28049, Spain

One of the basic operations in sensory processing is the computation of the temporal order of excitation of sensors. Motivated by the discrepancy between models and experiments at high signal contrast, we obtain families of algorithms by solutions of a general set of equations that define temporal order detection as an input-to-output relationship. Delays and nonlinear operations are the basis of all algorithms found, but different algorithmic structures exist when the operations are multiplications, OR gates, different types of AND-NOT logical gates, or concatenated AND-NOT gates. Among others, we obtain the Hassenstein-Reichardt model, a network using a multiplicative operation that has been proposed to explain fly optomotor behavior. We also find extensions of the Barlow-Levick model (based on an AND-NOT gate with delayed inhibition and nondelayed excitation as inputs), originally proposed to explain the bipolar cell response of the rabbit retina to motion stimuli. In the extended models, there are two more steps, another AND-NOT gate, and a subtraction or two subtractions that make the model responsive only to motion. In response to low-contrast inputs, the concatenated AND-NOT gates or the AND-NOT gate followed by a subtraction in these new models act as the multiplicative operation in the Hassenstein-Reichardt model. At high contrast, the new models behave like the Hassenstein-Reichardt model except that they are independent of contrast as observed experimentally.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The MIT Press.