HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pfister, J.-P. Articles by Gerstner, W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pfister, J.-P. Articles by Gerstner, W.

Optimal Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity for Precise Action Potential Firing in Supervised Learning

jean-pascal.pfister{at}epfl.ch

Taro Toyoizumi

taro{at}sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp

David Barber

david.barber{at}idiap.ch

Wulfram Gerstner

wulfram.gerstner{at}epfl.chLaboratory of Computational Neuroscience, School of Computer and Communication Sciences and Brain-Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

In timing-based neural codes, neurons have to emit action potentials at precise moments in time. We use a supervised learning paradigm to derive a synaptic update rule that optimizes by gradient ascent the likelihood of postsynaptic firing at one or several desired firing times. We find that the optimal strategy of up- and downregulating synaptic efficacies depends on the relative timing between presynaptic spike arrival and desired postsynaptic firing. If the presynaptic spike arrives before the desired postsynaptic spike timing, our optimal learning rule predicts that the synapse should become potentiated. The dependence of the potentiation on spike timing directly reflects the time course of an excitatory postsynaptic potential. However, our approach gives no unique reason for synaptic depression under reversed spike timing. In fact, the presence and amplitude of depression of synaptic efficacies for reversed spike timing depend on how constraints are implemented in the optimization problem. Two different constraints, control of postsynaptic rates and control of temporal locality, are studied. The relation of our results to spike-timing-dependent plasticity and reinforcement learning is discussed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Farries and A. L. Fairhall Reinforcement Learning With Modulated Spike Timing Dependent Synaptic Plasticity J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3648 - 3665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. V. Florian Reinforcement Learning Through Modulation of Spike-Timing-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity Neural Comput., June 1, 2007; 19(6): 1468 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Bohte and M. C. Mozer Reducing the variability of neural responses: a computational theory of spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Neural Comput., February 1, 2007; 19(2): 371 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]