HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cheng, S. Articles by Sabes, P. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cheng, S. Articles by Sabes, P. N.

Modeling Sensorimotor Learning with Linear Dynamical Systems

chengs{at}phy.ucsf.edu

Philip N. Sabes

sabes{at}phy.ucsf.edu Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neurobiology, W. M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience and Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0444, U.S.A.

Recent studies have employed simple linear dynamical systems to model trial-by-trial dynamics in various sensorimotor learning tasks. Here we explore the theoretical and practical considerations that arise when employing the general class of linear dynamical systems (LDS) as a model for sensorimotor learning. In this framework, the state of the system is a set of parameters that define the current sensorimotor transformation—the function that maps sensory inputs to motor outputs. The class of LDS models provides a first-order approximation for any Markovian (state-dependent) learning rule that specifies the changes in the sensorimotor transformation that result from sensory feedback on each movement. We show that modeling the trial-by-trial dynamics of learning provides a substantially enhanced picture of the process of adaptation compared to measurements of the steady state of adaptation derived from more traditional blocked-exposure experiments. Specifically, these models can be used to quantify sensory and performance biases, the extent to which learned changes in the sensorimotor transformation decay over time, and the portion of motor variability due to either learning or performance variability. We show that previous attempts to fit such models with linear regression have not generally yielded consistent parameter estimates. Instead, we present an expectation-maximization algorithm for fitting LDS models to experimental data and describe the difficulties inherent in estimating the parameters associated with feedback-driven learning. Finally, we demonstrate the application of these methods in a simple sensorimotor learning experiment: adaptation to shifted visual feedback during reaching.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Casadio, V. Sanguineti, P. Morasso, and C. Solaro Abnormal sensorimotor control, but intact force field adaptation, in multiple sclerosis subjects with no clinical disability Multiple Sclerosis, April 1, 2008; 14(3): 330 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Srimal, J. Diedrichsen, E. B. Ryklin, and C. E. Curtis Obligatory Adaptation of Saccade Gains J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1554 - 1558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Liu and E. Todorov Evidence for the Flexible Sensorimotor Strategies Predicted by Optimal Feedback Control J. Neurosci., August 29, 2007; 27(35): 9354 - 9368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Cheng and P. N. Sabes Calibration of Visually Guided Reaching Is Driven by Error-Corrective Learning and Internal Dynamics J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 3057 - 3069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]