Neural Comp. Sign up for ETOCS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudolph, M.
Right arrow Articles by Destexhe, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rudolph, M.
Right arrow Articles by Destexhe, A.
(Neural Computation. 2006;18:2917-2922.)
© 2006 The MIT Press

Note

On the Use of Analytical Expressions for the Voltage Distribution to Analyze Intracellular Recordings

Michelle Rudolph

Rudolph{at}iaf.cnrs-gif.fr

Alain Destexhe

Alain.Destexhe{at}iaf.cnrs-gif.fr Unité de Neuroscience Intégratives et Computationnelles, CNRS, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Different analytical expressions for the membrane potential distribution of membranes subject to synaptic noise have been proposed and can be very helpful in analyzing experimental data. However, all of these expressions are either approximations or limit cases, and it is not clear how they compare and which expression should be used in a given situation. In this note, we provide a comparison of the different approximations available, with an aim of delineating which expression is most suitable for analyzing experimental data.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The MIT Press.