HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thomson, E. E. Articles by Kristan, W. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thomson, E. E. Articles by Kristan, W. B.

Quantifying Stimulus Discriminability: A Comparison of Information Theory and Ideal Observer Analysis

ethomson{at}ucsd.edu, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0357, U.S.A.

William B. Kristan

wkristan{at}ucsd.edu, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0357, U.S.A.

Performance in sensory discrimination tasks is commonly quantified using either information theory or ideal observer analysis. These two quantitative frameworks are often assumed to be equivalent. For example, higher mutual information is said to correspond to improved performance of an ideal observer in a stimulus estimation task. To the contrary, drawing on and extending previous results, we show that five information-theoretic quantities (entropy, response-conditional entropy, specific information, equivocation, and mutual information) violate this assumption. More positively, we show how these information measures can be used to calculate upper and lower bounds on ideal observer performance, and vice versa. The results show that the mathematical resources of ideal observer analysis are preferable to information theory for evaluating performance in a stimulus discrimination task. We also discuss the applicability of information theory to questions that ideal observer analysis cannot address.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. G. Borghuis, C. P. Ratliff, R. G. Smith, P. Sterling, and V. Balasubramanian Design of a Neuronal Array J. Neurosci., March 19, 2008; 28(12): 3178 - 3189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. E. Thomson and W. B. Kristan Encoding and decoding touch location in the leech CNS. J. Neurosci., July 26, 2006; 26(30): 8009 - 8016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. B. Averbeck and D. Lee Effects of Noise Correlations on Information Encoding and Decoding J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3633 - 3644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Baca, E. E. Thomson, and W. B. Kristan Jr. Location and Intensity Discrimination in the Leech Local Bend Response Quantified Using Optic Flow and Principal Components Analysis J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3560 - 3572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]