HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Börgers, C. Articles by Kopell, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Börgers, C. Articles by Kopell, N.

Effects of Noisy Drive on Rhythms in Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons

christoph.borgers{at}tufts.edu, Department of Mathematics, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, U.S.A.

Nancy Kopell

nk{at}math.bu.eds, Department of Mathematics and Center for BioDynamics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, U.S.A.

Synchronous rhythmic spiking in neuronal networks can be brought about by the interaction between E-cells and Icells (excitatory and inhibitory cells). The I-cells gate and synchronize the E-cells, and the E-cells drive and synchronize the I-cells. We refer to rhythms generated in this way as PING (pyramidal-interneuronal gamma) rhythms. The PING mechanism requires that the drive I_I to the I-cells be sufficiently low; the rhythm is lost when I_I gets too large. This can happen in at least two ways. In the first mechanism, the I-cells spike in synchrony, but get ahead of the E-cells, spiking without being prompted by the E-cells. We call this phase walkthrough of the I-cells. In the second mechanism, the I-cells fail to synchronize, and their activity leads to complete suppression of the E-cells. Noisy spiking in the E-cells, generated by noisy external drive, adds excitatory drive to the I-cells and may lead to phase walkthrough. Noisy spiking in the I-cells adds inhibition to the E-cells and may lead to suppression of the E-cells. An analysis of the conditions under which noise leads to phase walkthrough of the I-cells or suppression of the E-cells shows that PING rhythms at frequencies far below the gamma range are robust to noise only if network parameter values are tuned very carefully. Together with an argument explaining why the PING mechanism does not work far above the gamma range in the presence of heterogeneity, this justifies the "G" in "PING."

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. I. Buia and P. H. Tiesinga Role of Interneuron Diversity in the Cortical Microcircuit for Attention J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2158 - 2182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Borgers and N. J. Kopell Gamma Oscillations and Stimulus Selection Neural Comput., February 1, 2008; 20(2): 383 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Borgers, S. Epstein, and N. J. Kopell Background gamma rhythmicity and attention in cortical local circuits: A computational study PNAS, May 10, 2005; 102(19): 7002 - 7007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]