Neural Comp. Sign up for ETOCS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Latham, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Nirenberg, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Latham, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Nirenberg, S.
(Neural Computation. 2004;16:1385-1412.)
© 2004 The MIT Press


Letter

Computing and Stability in Cortical Networks

Peter E. Latham

pel{at}gatsby.ucl.ac.uk, Department of Neurobiology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1763, U.S.A.

Sheila Nirenberg

sheilan{at}ucla.edu, Department of Neurobiology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1763, U.S.A.

Cortical neurons are predominantly excitatory and highly interconnected. In spite of this, the cortex is remarkably stable: normal brains do not exhibit the kind of runaway excitation one might expect of such a system. How does the cortex maintain stability in the face of this massive excitatory feedback? More importantly, how does it do so during computations, which necessarily involve elevated firing rates? Here we address these questions in the context of attractor networks—networks that exhibit multiple stable states, or memories. We find that such networks can be stabilized at the relatively low firing rates observed in vivo if two conditions are met: (1) the background state, where all neurons are firing at low rates, is inhibition dominated, and (2) the fraction of neurons involved in a memory is above some threshold, so that there is sufficient coupling between the memory neurons and the background. This allows "dynamical stabilization" of the attractors, meaning feedback from the pool of background neurons stabilizes what would otherwise be an unstable state. We suggest that dynamical stabilization may be a strategy used for a broad range of computations, not just those involving attractors.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F. C. Joelving, A. Compte, and C. Constantinidis
Temporal Properties of Posterior Parietal Neuron Discharges During Working Memory and Passive Viewing
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 2254 - 2266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by The MIT Press.