HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Salinas, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Salinas, E.

Background Synaptic Activity as a Switch Between Dynamical States in a Network

esalinas{at}wfubmc.edu Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1010, U.S.A.

A bright red light may trigger a sudden motor action in a driver crossing an intersection: stepping at once on the brakes. The same red light, however, may be entirely inconsequential if it appears, say, inside a movie theater. Clearly, context determines whether a particular stimulus will trigger a motor response, but what is the neural correlate of this? How does the nervous system enable or disable whole networks so that they are responsive or not to a given sensory signal? Using theoretical models and computer simulations, I show that networks of neurons have a built-in capacity to switch between two types of dynamic state: one in which activity is low and approximately equal for all units, and another in which different activity distributions are possible and may even change dynamically. This property allows whole circuits to be turned on or off by weak, unstructured inputs. These results are illustrated using networks of integrate-and-fire neurons with diverse architectures. In agreement with the analytic calculations, a uniform background input may determine whether a random network has one or two stable firing levels; it may give rise to randomly alternating firing episodes in a circuit with reciprocal inhibition; and it may regulate the capacity of a center-surround circuit to produce either self-sustained activity or traveling waves. Thus, the functional properties of a network may be drastically modified by a simple, weak signal. This mechanism works as long as the network is able to exhibit stable firing states, or attractors.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Moreno-Bote, J. Rinzel, and N. Rubin Noise-Induced Alternations in an Attractor Network Model of Perceptual Bistability J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1125 - 1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Heinzle, K. Hepp, and K. A. C. Martin A Microcircuit Model of the Frontal Eye Fields J. Neurosci., August 29, 2007; 27(35): 9341 - 9353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kumar, S. Schrader, A. Aertsen, and S. Rotter The High-Conductance State of Cortical Networks Neural Comput., January 1, 2007; 20(1): 1 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Basalyga and E. Salinas When response variability increases neural network robustness to synaptic noise. Neural Comput., June 1, 2006; 18(6): 1349 - 1379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. K. Machens, R. Romo, and C. D. Brody Flexible Control of Mutual Inhibition: A Neural Model of Two-Interval Discrimination Science, February 18, 2005; 307(5712): 1121 - 1124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Giugliano, P. Darbon, M. Arsiero, H.-R. Luscher, and J. Streit Single-Neuron Discharge Properties and Network Activity in Dissociated Cultures of Neocortex J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2004; 92(2): 977 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]