Neural Comp. NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikula, S.
Right arrow Articles by Niebur, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mikula, S.
Right arrow Articles by Niebur, E.
(Neural Computation. 2003;15:2339-2358.)
© 2003 The MIT Press


Letter

Synaptic Depression Leads to Nonmonotonic Frequency Dependence in the Coincidence Detector

Shawn Mikula

mikula{at}jhmi.edu, Krieger Mind/Brain Institute and Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, U.S.A.

Ernst Niebur

niebur{at}jhu.edu, Krieger Mind/Brain Institute and Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, U.S.A.

In this letter, we extend our previous analytical results (Mikula & Niebur, 2003) for the coincidence detector by taking into account probabilistic frequency-dependent synaptic depression. We present a solution for the steady-state output rate of an ideal coincidence detector receiving an arbitrary number of input spike trains with identical binomial count distributions (which includes Poisson statistics as a special case) and identical arbitrary pairwise cross-correlations, from zero correlation (independent processes) to perfect correlation (identical processes). Synapses vary their efficacy probabilistically according to the observed depression mechanisms. Our results show that synaptic depression, if made sufficiently strong, will result in an inverted U-shaped curve for the output rate of a coincidence detector as a function of input rate. This leads to the counterintuitive prediction that higher presynaptic (input) rates may lead to lower postsynaptic (output) rates where the output rate may fall faster than the inverse of the input rate.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. R. Stoelzel, Y. Bereshpolova, A. G. Gusev, and H. A. Swadlow
The Impact of an LGNd Impulse on the Awake Visual Cortex: Synaptic Dynamics and the Sustained/Transient Distinction
J. Neurosci., May 7, 2008; 28(19): 5018 - 5028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. E. Lewis, B. Lindner, B. Laliberte, and S. Groothuis
Control of neuronal firing by dynamic parallel fiber feedback: implications for electrosensory reafference suppression
J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2007; 210(24): 4437 - 4447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
E. Niebur
Generation of synthetic spike trains with defined pairwise correlations.
Neural Comput., July 1, 2007; 19(7): 1720 - 1738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
S. Mikula and E. Niebur
Rate and Synchrony in Feedforward Networks of Coincidence Detectors: Analytical Solution
Neural Comput., April 1, 2005; 17(4): 881 - 902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by The MIT Press.