Neural Comp. Sign up for ETOCS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kristan, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kristan, W. B., Jr.
(Neural Computation. 2002;14:561-581.)
© 2002 The MIT Press


Letter

Analysis of Oscillations in a Reciprocally Inhibitory Network with Synaptic Depression

Adam L. Taylor

ataylor{at}ucsd.edu, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla CA 92093-0357, U.S.A.

Garrison W. Cottrell

gary{at}cs.ucsd.edu, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla CA 92093-0357, U.S.A.

William B. Kristan, Jr.

wkristan{at}ucsd.edu, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla CA 92093-0357, U.S.A.

We present and analyze a model of a two-cell reciprocally inhibitory network that oscillates. The principal mechanism of oscillation is short-term synaptic depression. Using a simple model of depression and analyzing the system in certain limits, we can derive analytical expressions for various features of the oscillation, including the parameter regime in which stable oscillations occur, as well as the period and amplitude of these oscillations. These expressions are functions of three parameters: the time constant of depression, the synaptic strengths, and the amount of tonic excitation the cells receive. We compare our analytical results with the output of numerical simulations and obtain good agreement between the two. Based on our analysis, we conclude that the oscillations in our network are qualitatively different from those in networks that oscillate due to postinhibitory rebound, spike-frequency adaptation, or other intrinsic (rather than synaptic) adaptational mechanisms. In particular, our network can oscillate only via the synaptic escape mode of Skinner, Kopell, and Marder (1994).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
W.-C. Li, B. Sautois, A. Roberts, and S. R. Soffe
Reconfiguration of a Vertebrate Motor Network: Specific Neuron Recruitment and Context-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity
J. Neurosci., November 7, 2007; 27(45): 12267 - 12276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Shpiro, R. Curtu, J. Rinzel, and N. Rubin
Dynamical Characteristics Common to Neuronal Competition Models
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 462 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Mamiya and F. Nadim
Dynamic Interaction of Oscillatory Neurons Coupled with Reciprocally Inhibitory Synapses Acts to Stabilize the Rhythm Period
J. Neurosci., June 2, 2004; 24(22): 5140 - 5150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2002 by The MIT Press.