|
|
||||||||
Note |
brown{at}srlb.mgh.harvard.edu, Neuroscience Statistics Research Laboratory, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, U.S.A., and Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A.
barbieri{at}srlb.mgh.harvard.edu, Neuroscience Statistics Research Laboratory, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, U.S.A.
vventura{at}stat.cmv.edu
kass{at}stat.cmu.edu, Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University, Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburg, PA 15213, U.S.A.
loren{at}neurostat.mgh.harvard.edu, Neuroscience Statistics Research Laboratory, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, U.S.A.
Measuring agreement between a statistical model and a spike train data series, that is, evaluating goodness of fit, is crucial for establishing the model's validity prior to using it to make inferences about a particular neural system. Assessing goodness-of-fit is a challenging problem for point process neural spike train models, especially for histogram-based models such as perstimulus time histograms (PSTH) and rate functions estimated by spike train smoothing. The time-rescaling theorem is a well-known result in probability theory, which states that any point process with an integrable conditional intensity function may be transformed into a Poisson process with unit rate. We describe how the theorem may be used to develop goodness-of-fit tests for both parametric and histogram-based point process models of neural spike trains. We apply these tests in two examples: a comparison of PSTH, inhomogeneous Poisson, and inhomogeneous Markov interval models of neural spike trains from the supplementary eye field of a macque monkey and a comparison of temporal and spatial smoothers, inhomogeneous Poisson, inhomogeneous gamma, and inhomogeneous inverse gaussian models of rat hippocampal place cell spiking activity. To help make the logic behind the time-rescaling theorem more accessible to researchers in neuroscience, we present a proof using only elementary probability theory arguments. We also show how the theorem may be used to simulate a general point process model of a spike train. Our paradigm makes it possible to compare parametric and histogram-based neural spike train models directly. These results suggest that the time-rescaling theorem can be a valuable tool for neural spike train data analysis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Koyama and R. E. Kass Spike Train Probability Models for Stimulus-Driven Leaky Integrate-and-Fire Neurons Neural Comput., July 1, 2008; 20(7): 1776 - 1795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hake and G. T. Lines Stochastic Binding of Ca2+ Ions in the Dyadic Cleft; Continuous versus Random Walk Description of Diffusion Biophys. J., June 1, 2008; 94(11): 4184 - 4201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Czanner, U. T. Eden, S. Wirth, M. Yanike, W. A. Suzuki, and E. N. Brown Analysis of Between-Trial and Within-Trial Neural Spiking Dynamics J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2672 - 2693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Itskov, C. Curto, and K. D. Harris Valuations for spike train prediction. Neural Comput., March 1, 2008; 20(3): 644 - 667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. Cohen, P. Pouget, G. F. Woodman, C. R. Subraveti, J. D. Schall, and A. F. Rossi Difficulty of Visual Search Modulates Neuronal Interactions and Response Variability in the Frontal Eye Field J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2580 - 2587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Srinivasan, U. T. Eden, S. K. Mitter, and E. N. Brown General-Purpose Filter Design for Neural Prosthetic Devices J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2456 - 2475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Victor, E. M. Blessing, J. D. Forte, P. Buzas, and P. R. Martin Response variability of marmoset parvocellular neurons J. Physiol., February 15, 2007; 579(1): 29 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Miura, M. Okada, and S.-i. Amari Estimating Spiking Irregularities Under Changing Environments. Neural Comput., October 1, 2006; 18(10): 2359 - 2386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Srinivasan, U. T. Eden, A. S. Willsky, and E. N. Brown A State-Space Analysis for Reconstruction of Goal-Directed Movements Using Neural Signals. Neural Comput., October 1, 2006; 18(10): 2465 - 2494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakahara, S.-i. Amari, and B. J. Richmond A comparison of descriptive models of a single spike train by information-geometric measure. Neural Comput., March 1, 2006; 18(3): 545 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Amarasingham, T.-L. Chen, S. Geman, M. T. Harrison, and D. L. Sheinberg Spike Count Reliability and the Poisson Hypothesis J. Neurosci., January 18, 2006; 26(3): 801 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Ventura, C. Cai, and R. E. Kass Trial-to-Trial Variability and Its Effect on Time-Varying Dependency Between Two Neurons J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2928 - 2939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Ventura, C. Cai, and R. E. Kass Statistical Assessment of Time-Varying Dependency Between Two Neurons J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2940 - 2947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Mottram, E. A. Christou, F. G. Meyer, and R. M. Enoka Frequency Modulation of Motor Unit Discharge Has Task-Dependent Effects on Fluctuations in Motor Output J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2878 - 2887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Okatan, M. A. Wilson, and E. N. Brown Analyzing Functional Connectivity Using a Network Likelihood Model of Ensemble Neural Spiking Activity Neural Comput., September 1, 2005; 17(9): 1927 - 1961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Kass, V. Ventura, and E. N. Brown Statistical Issues in the Analysis of Neuronal Data J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 8 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Truccolo, U. T. Eden, M. R. Fellows, J. P. Donoghue, and E. N. Brown A Point Process Framework for Relating Neural Spiking Activity to Spiking History, Neural Ensemble, and Extrinsic Covariate Effects J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2005; 93(2): 1074 - 1089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Barbieri, E. C. Matten, A. A. Alabi, and E. N. Brown A point-process model of human heartbeat intervals: new definitions of heart rate and heart rate variability Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): H424 - H435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Paninski, J. W. Pillow, and E. P. Simoncelli Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Stochastic Integrate-and-Fire Neural Encoding Model Neural Comput., December 1, 2004; 16(12): 2533 - 2561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Ventura Testing for and Estimating Latency Effects for Poisson and Non-Poisson Spike Trains Neural Comput., November 1, 2004; 16(11): 2323 - 2349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. T. Eden, L. M. Frank, R. Barbieri, V. Solo, and E. N. Brown Dynamic Analysis of Neural Encoding by Point Process Adaptive Filtering Neural Comput., May 1, 2004; 16(5): 971 - 998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Barbieri, L. M. Frank, D. P. Nguyen, M. C. Quirk, V. Solo, M. A. Wilson, and E. N. Brown Dynamic Analyses of Information Encoding in Neural Ensembles Neural Comput., February 1, 2004; 16(2): 277 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Wiener An Adjustment to the Time-Rescaling Method for Application to Short-Trial Spike Train Data Neural Comput., November 1, 2003; 15(11): 2565 - 2576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Smith and E. N. Brown Estimating a State-Space Model from Point Process Observations Neural Comput., May 1, 2003; 15(5): 965 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Wiener and B. J. Richmond Decoding Spike Trains Instant by Instant Using Order Statistics and the Mixture-of-Poissons Model J. Neurosci., March 15, 2003; 23(6): 2394 - 2406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Frank, U. T. Eden, V. Solo, M. A. Wilson, and E. N. Brown Contrasting Patterns of Receptive Field Plasticity in the Hippocampus and the Entorhinal Cortex: An Adaptive Filtering Approach J. Neurosci., May 1, 2002; 22(9): 3817 - 3830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE | NEURAL COMPUTATION | MIT PRESS JOURNALS |