Neural Comp. Sign up for ETOCS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Poggio, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Poggio, T. A.
(Neural Computation. 2002;14:2857-2881.)
© 2002 The MIT Press


Letter

Biophysiologically Plausible Implementations of the Maximum Operation

Angela J. Yu

feraina{at}gatsby.ucl.ac.uk, Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, U.K.

Martin A. Giese

martin.giese{at}tuebingen.mpg.de, Department for Cognitive Neurology, University Clinic Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany

Tomaso A. Poggio

tp{at}ai.mit.edu, CBCL, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, U.S.A.

Visual processing in the cortex can be characterized by a predominantly hierarchical architecture, in which specialized brain regions along the processing pathways extract visual features of increasing complexity, accompanied by greater invariance in stimulus properties such as size and position. Various studies have postulated that a nonlinear pooling function such as the maximum (MAX) operation could be fundamental in achieving such selectivity and invariance. In this article, we are concerned with neurally plausible mechanisms that may be involved in realizing the MAX operation. Different canonical models are proposed, each based on neural mechanisms that have been previously discussed in the context of cortical processing. Through simulations and mathematical analysis, we compare the performance and robustness of these mechanisms. We derive experimentally verifiable predictions for each model and discuss the relevant physiological considerations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
M. Kouh and T. Poggio
A Canonical Neural Circuit for Cortical Nonlinear Operations
Neural Comput., June 1, 2008; 20(6): 1427 - 1451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
R. J. Vogelstein, U. Mallik, E. Culurciello, G. Cauwenberghs, and R. Etienne-Cummings
A multichip neuromorphic system for spike-based visual information processing.
Neural Comput., September 1, 2007; 19(9): 2281 - 2300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. Cadieu, M. Kouh, A. Pasupathy, C. E. Connor, M. Riesenhuber, and T. Poggio
A Model of V4 Shape Selectivity and Invariance
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1733 - 1750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
J. Lucke and C. von der Malsburg
Rapid Processing and Unsupervised Learning in a Model of the Cortical Macrocolumn
Neural Comput., March 1, 2004; 16(3): 501 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2002 by The MIT Press.