Neural Comp. NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gütig, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rotter, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gütig, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rotter, S.
(Neural Computation. 2002;14:121-153.)
© 2002 The MIT Press


Letter

Statistical Significance of Coincident Spikes: Count-Based Versus Rate-Based Statistics

Robert Gütig

guetig{at}biologie.uni-freiburg.de

Ad Aertsen

aertsen{at}biologie.uni-freiburg.de

Stefan Rotter

rotter{at}biologie.uni-freiburg.de, Neurobiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biology III, Albert-Ludwigs-University, 79104 Freiburg, Germany

Inspired by different conceptualizations of temporal neural coding schemes, there has been recent interest in the search for signs of precisely synchronized neural activity in the cortex. One method developed for this task is unitary-event analysis. This method tests multiple single-neuron recordings for short epochs with significantly more coincident spikes than expected from independent neurons. We reformulated the statistical test underlying this method using a coincidence count distribution based on empirical spike counts rather than on estimated spike probabilities. In the case of two neurons, the requirement of stationary firing rates, originally imposed on both neurons, can be relaxed; only the rate of one neuron needs to be stationary, while the other may follow an arbitrary time course. By analytical calculations of the test power curves of the original and the revised method, we demonstrate that the test power can be increased by a factor of two or more in physiologically realistic regimes. In addition, we analyze the effective significance levels of both methods for neural firing rates ranging between 0.2 Hz and 30 Hz.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. B. Katz
Making Time With Taste. Focus on "Taste Response Variability and Temporal Coding in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract of the Rat"
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1375 - 1376.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
H. Nakahara and S.-i. Amari
Information-Geometric Measure for Neural Spikes
Neural Comput., October 1, 2002; 14(10): 2269 - 2316.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2002 by The MIT Press.