Neural Comp. NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heinz, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Carney, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heinz, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Carney, L. H.
(Neural Computation. 2001;13:2273-2316.)
© 2001 The MIT Press


Letter

Evaluating Auditory Performance Limits: I. One-Parameter Discrimination Using a Computational Model for the Auditory Nerve

Michael G. Heinz

Speech and Hearing Sciences Program, Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A., and Hearing Research Center, Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, U.S.A.

H. Steven Colburn

Hearing Research Center, Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, U.S.A.

Laurel H. Carney

Hearing Research Center, Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, U.S.A.

A method for calculating psychophysical performance limits based on stochastic neural responses is introduced and compared to previous analytical methods for evaluating auditory discrimination of tone frequency and level. The method uses signal detection theory and a computational model for a population of auditory nerve (AN) fiber responses. The use of computational models allows predictions to be made over a wider parameter range and with more complete descriptions of AN responses than in analytical models. Performance based on AN discharge times (all-information) is compared to performance based only on discharge counts (rate-place). After the method is verified over the range of parameters for which previous analytical models are applicable, the parameter space is then extended. For example, a computational model of AN activity that extends to high frequencies is used to explore the common belief that rate-place information is responsible for frequency encoding at high frequencies due to the rolloff in AN phase locking above 2 kHz. This rolloff is thought to eliminate temporal information at high frequencies. Contrary to this belief, results of this analysis show that rate-place predictions for frequency discrimination are inconsistent with human performance in the dependence on frequency for high frequencies and that there is significant temporal information in the AN up to at least 10 kHz. In fact, the all-information predictions match the functional dependence of human performance on frequency, although optimal performance is much better than human performance. The use of computational AN models in this study provides new constraints on hypotheses of neural encoding of frequency in the auditory system; however, the method is limited to simple tasks with deterministic stimuli. A companion article in this issue ("Evaluating Auditory Performance Limits: II") describes an extension of this approach to more complex tasks that include random variation of one parameter, for example, random-level variation, which is often used in psychophysics to test neural encoding hypotheses.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
A. J. Oxenham
Pitch Perception and Auditory Stream Segregation: Implications for Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implants
Trends in Amplification, December 1, 2008; 12(4): 316 - 331.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
T. Vongpaisal and M. K. Pichora-Fuller
Effect of Age on F0 Difference Limen and Concurrent Vowel Identification
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2007; 50(5): 1139 - 1156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Avissar, A. C. Furman, J. C. Saunders, and T. D. Parsons
Adaptation Reduces Spike-Count Reliability, But Not Spike-Timing Precision, of Auditory Nerve Responses
J. Neurosci., June 13, 2007; 27(24): 6461 - 6472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. C. Nelson and L. H. Carney
Neural Rate and Timing Cues for Detection and Discrimination of Amplitude-Modulated Tones in the Awake Rabbit Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 522 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F.-G. Zeng, Y.-Y. Kong, H. J. Michalewski, and A. Starr
Perceptual Consequences of Disrupted Auditory Nerve Activity
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3050 - 3063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. N. Temchin, A. Recio-Spinoso, P. van Dijk, and M. A. Ruggero
Wiener Kernels of Chinchilla Auditory-Nerve Fibers: Verification Using Responses to Tones, Clicks, and Noise and Comparison With Basilar-Membrane Vibrations
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3635 - 3648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by The MIT Press.