HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Roy, A. Articles by Niebur, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Roy, A. Articles by Niebur, E.

Rate Limitations of Unitary Event Analysis

Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, U.S.A.

P. N. Steinmetz

Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, U.S.A.

E. Niebur

Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, U.S.A.

Unitary event analysis is a new method for detecting episodes of synchronized neural activity (Riehle, Grün, Diesmann, & Aertsen, 1997). It detects time intervals that contain coincident firing at higher rates than would be expected if the neurons fired as independent inhomogeneous Poisson processes; all coincidences in such intervals are called unitary events (UEs). Changes in the frequency of UEs that are correlated with behavioral states may indicate synchronization of neural firing that mediates or represents the behavioral state.

We show that UE analysis is subject to severe limitations due to the underlying discrete statistics of the number of coincident events. These limitations are particularly stringent for low (0–10 spikes/s) firing rates. Under these conditions, the frequency of UEs is a random variable with a large variation relative to its mean. The relative variation decreases with increasing firing rate, and we compute the lowest firing rate, at which the 95% confidence interval around the mean frequency of UEs excludes zero.

This random variation in UE frequency makes interpretation of changes in UEs problematic for neurons with low firing rates. As a typical example, when analyzing 150 trials of an experiment using an averaging window 100 ms wide and a 5 ms coincidence window, firing rates should be greater than 7 spikes per second.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Roy, P. N. Steinmetz, S. S. Hsiao, K. O. Johnson, and E. Niebur Synchrony: A Neural Correlate of Somatosensory Attention J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1645 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. Smith and E. N. Brown Estimating a State-Space Model from Point Process Observations Neural Comput., May 1, 2003; 15(5): 965 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Nakahara and S.-i. Amari Information-Geometric Measure for Neural Spikes Neural Comput., October 1, 2002; 14(10): 2269 - 2316. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. Grun, M. Diesmann, and A. Aertsen Unitary Events in Multiple Single-Neuron Spiking Activity: I. Detection and Significance Neural Comput., January 1, 2002; 14(1): 43 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Gutig, A. Aertsen, and S. Rotter Statistical Significance of Coincident Spikes: Count-Based Versus Rate-Based Statistics Neural Comput., January 1, 2002; 14(1): 121 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]