Neural Comp. Sign up for ETOCS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levitan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Reggia, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levitan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Reggia, J. A.
(Neural Computation. 2000;12:2037-2062.)
© 2000 The MIT Press


Letter

A Computational Model of Lateralization and Asymmetries in Cortical Maps

Svetlana Levitan

Deptartments of Computer Science and Neurology, Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, U.S.A.

James A. Reggia

Deptartments of Computer Science and Neurology, Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, U.S.A.

While recent experimental work has defined asymmetries and lateralization in left and right cortical maps, the mechanisms underlying these phenomena are currently not established. In order to explore some possible mechanisms in theory, we studied a neural model consisting of paired cerebral hemispheric regions interacting via a simulated corpus callosum. Starting with random synaptic strengths, unsupervised (Hebbian) synaptic modifications led to the emergence of a topographic map in one or both hemispheric regions. Because of uncertainties concerning the nature of hemispheric interactions, both excitatory and inhibitory callosal influences were examined independently. A sharp transition in model behavior was observed depending on callosal strength. For excitatory or weakly inhibitory callosal interactions, complete and symmetric mirror-image maps generally appeared in both hemispheric regions. In contrast, with stronger inhibitory callosal interactions, partial to complete map lateralization tended to occur, and the maps in each hemispheric region often became complementary. Lateralization occurred readily toward the side having a larger cortical region or higher excitability. Asymmetric synaptic plasticity, however, had only a transitory effect on lateralization. These results support the hypotheses that interhemispheric competition occurs, that multiple underlying asymmetries may lead to function lateralization, and that the effects of asymmetric synaptic plasticity may vary depending on whether supervised or unsupervised learning is involved. To our knowledge, this is the first computational model to demonstrate the emergence of topographic map lateralization and asymmetries.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. E. Stephan, J. C. Marshall, W. D. Penny, K. J. Friston, and G. R. Fink
Interhemispheric Integration of Visual Processing during Task-Driven Lateralization
J. Neurosci., March 28, 2007; 27(13): 3512 - 3522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2000 by The MIT Press.