Neural Comp. NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shao, X.
Right arrow Articles by Li, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shao, X.
Right arrow Articles by Li, W.
(Neural Computation. 2000;12:1969-1986.)
© 2000 The MIT Press


Letter

Measuring the VC-Dimension Using Optimized Experimental Design

Xuhui Shao

ECE Department, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, U.S.A.

Vladimir Cherkassky

ECE Department, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, U.S.A.

William Li

Operations and Management Science Deptartment, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, U.S.A.

VC-dimension is the measure of model complexity (capacity) used in VC-theory. The knowledge of the VC-dimension of an estimator is necessary for rigorous complexity control using analytic VC generalization bounds. Unfortunately, it is not possible to obtain the analytic estimates of the VC-dimension in most cases. Hence, a recent proposal is to measure the VC-dimension of an estimator experimentally by fitting the theoretical formula to a set of experimental measurements of the frequency of errors on artificially generated data sets of varying sizes (Vapnik, Levin, & Le Cun, 1994). However, it may be difficult to obtain an accurate estimate of the VC-dimension due to the variability of random samples in the experimental procedure proposed by Vapnik et al. (1994). We address this problem by proposing an improved design procedure for specifying the measurement points (i.e., the sample size and the number of repeated experiments at a given sample size). Our approach leads to a nonuniform design structure as opposed to the uniform design structure used in the original article (Vapnik et al., 1994). Our simulation results show that the proposed optimized design structure leads to a more accurate estimation of the VC-dimension using the experimental procedure. The results also show that a more accurate estimation of VC-dimension leads to improved complexity control using analytic VC-generalization bounds and, hence, better prediction accuracy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
V. Cherkassky and Y. Ma
Comparison of Model Selection for Regression
Neural Comput., July 1, 2003; 15(7): 1691 - 1714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2000 by The MIT Press.