Neural Comp. NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Japkowicz, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gluck, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Japkowicz, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gluck, M. A.
(Neural Computation. 2000;12:531-545.)
© 2000 The MIT Press


Note

Nonlinear Autoassociation Is Not Equivalent to PCA

Nathalie Japkowicz

Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 1W5

Stephen José Hanson

Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, U.S.A.

Mark A. Gluck

Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, U.S.A.

A common misperception within the neural network community is that even with nonlinearities in their hidden layer, autoassociators trained with backpropagation are equivalent to linear methods such as principal component analysis (PCA). Our purpose is to demonstrate that nonlinear autoassociators actually behave differently from linear methods and that they can outperform these methods when used for latent extraction, projection, and classification. While linear autoassociators emulate PCA, and thus exhibit a flat or unimodal reconstruction error surface, autoassociators with nonlinearities in their hidden layer learn domains by building error reconstruction surfaces that, depending on the task, contain multiple local valleys. This interpolation bias allows nonlinear autoassociators to represent appropriate classifications of nonlinear multimodal domains, in contrast to linear autoassociators, which are inappropriate for such tasks. In fact, autoassociators with hidden unit nonlinearities can be shown to perform nonlinear classification and nonlinear recognition.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
T. Karkkainen
MLP in Layer-Wise Form with Applications to Weight Decay
Neural Comput., June 1, 2002; 14(6): 1451 - 1480.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2000 by The MIT Press.