Neural Comp. Sign up for ETOCS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maass, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maass, W.
(Neural Computation. 2000;12:2519-2535.)
© 2000 The MIT Press


Note

On the Computational Power of Winner-Take-All

Wolfgang Maass

Institute for Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universität Graz, A-8010 Graz, Austria

This article initiates a rigorous theoretical analysis of the computational power of circuits that employ modules for computing winner-take-all. Computational models that involve competitive stages have so far been neglected in computational complexity theory, although they are widely used in computational brain models, artificial neural networks, and analog VLSI. Our theoretical analysis shows that winner-take-all is a surprisingly powerful computational module in comparison with threshold gates (also referred to as McCulloch-Pitts neurons) and sigmoidal gates. We prove an optimal quadratic lower bound for computing winner-take-all in any feedforward circuit consisting of threshold gates. In addition we show that arbitrary continuous functions can be approximated by circuits employing a single soft winner-take-all gate as their only nonlinear operation.

Our theoretical analysis also provides answers to two basic questions raised by neurophysiologists in view of the well-known asymmetry between excitatory and inhibitory connections in cortical circuits: how much computational power of neural networks is lost if only positive weights are employed in weighted sums and how much adaptive capability is lost if only the positive weights are subject to plasticity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
J. Sima and P. Orponen
General-Purpose Computation with Neural Networks: A Survey of Complexity Theoretic Results
Neural Comput., December 1, 2003; 15(12): 2727 - 2778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
W. Maass, T. Natschlager, and H. Markram
Real-Time Computing Without Stable States: A New Framework for Neural Computation Based on Perturbations
Neural Comput., November 1, 2002; 14(11): 2531 - 2560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
X. Xie, R. H. R. Hahnloser, and H. S. Seung
Selectively Grouping Neurons in Recurrent Networks of Lateral Inhibition
Neural Comput., November 1, 2002; 14(11): 2627 - 2646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2000 by The MIT Press.