Neural Comp. NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cleland, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Linster, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cleland, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Linster, C.
(Neural Computation. 1999;11:1673-1690.)
© 1999 The MIT Press


Letter

Concentration Tuning Mediated by Spare Receptor Capacity in Olfactory Sensory Neurons: A Theoretical Study

Thomas A. Cleland

Department of Neuroscience, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, U.S.A.

Christiane Linster

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.

The olfactory system is capable of detecting odorants at very low concentrations. Physiological experiments have demonstrated odorant sensitivities down to the picomolar range in preparations from the sensory epithelium. However, the contemporary model for olfactory signal transduction provides that odorants bind to olfactory receptors with relatively low specificity and consequently low affinity, making this detection of low-concentration odorants theoretically difficult to understand. We employ acomputational model to demonstrate how olfactory sensory neuron (OSN) sensitivity can be tuned by modulation of receptor-effector coupling and/or by other mechanisms regulating spare receptor capacity, thus resolving this conundrum.

The EC10-90 intensity tuning ranges (ITRs) of whole olfactory glomeruli and postsynaptic mitral cells are considerably broader than the commensurate ITRs of individual OSNs. These data are difficult to reconcile with certain contemporary hypotheses that convergent OSNs in mammals exhibit a homogeneous population of olfactory receptors and identical tuning for odor stimuli. We show that heterogeneity in spare receptor capacities within a convergent OSN population can increase the ITR (EC10–90) of a convergent population of OSNs regardless of the presence or absence of adiversity of receptor expression within the population.

The modulation of receptor-effector coupling has been observed in OSNs; other mechanisms for cellular regulation of spare receptor capacity are also highly plausible (e.g., quantitative regulation of the relative expression levels of receptor and effector proteins). We present a model illustrating that these processes can underlie both how OSNs come to exhibit high sensitivity to odorant stimuli without necessitating increased ligand-receptor binding affinities or specificities and how a population of convergent OSNs could exhibit a broader concentration sensitivity than its individual constituent neurons, even given a population expressing identical odorant receptors. The regulation of spare receptor capacity may play animportant role in the olfactory system's ability to reliably detect low odor concentrations, discriminate odor intensities, and segregate this intensity information from representations of odor quality.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
T. A. Schoenfeld and T. A. Cleland
Anatomical Contributions to Odorant Sampling and Representation in Rodents: Zoning in on Sniffing Behavior
Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 131 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
T. A. Cleland and C. Linster
Computation in the Olfactory System
Chem Senses, November 1, 2005; 30(9): 801 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
P.-M. Lledo, G. Gheusi, and J.-D. Vincent
Information Processing in the Mammalian Olfactory System
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2005; 85(1): 281 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Wachowiak, W. Denk, and R. W. Friedrich
Functional organization of sensory input to the olfactory bulb glomerulus analyzed by two-photon calcium imaging
PNAS, June 15, 2004; 101(24): 9097 - 9102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. Bozza, P. Feinstein, C. Zheng, and P. Mombaerts
Odorant Receptor Expression Defines Functional Units in the Mouse Olfactory System
J. Neurosci., April 15, 2002; 22(8): 3033 - 3043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Wachowiak, L. B. Cohen, and M. R. Zochowski
Distributed and Concentration-Invariant Spatial Representations of Odorants by Receptor Neuron Input to the Turtle Olfactory Bulb
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2002; 87(2): 1035 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
W. M. Getz and P. Lansky
Receptor Dissociation Constants and the Information Entropy of Membranes Coding Ligand Concentration
Chem Senses, February 1, 2001; 26(2): 95 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
F. Xu, I. Kida, F. Hyder, and R. G. Shulman
Assessment and discrimination of odor stimuli in rat olfactory bulb by dynamic functional MRI
PNAS, September 5, 2000; (2000) 180321397.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
F. Xu, I. Kida, F. Hyder, and R. G. Shulman
Assessment and discrimination of odor stimuli in rat olfactory bulb by dynamic functional MRI
PNAS, September 12, 2000; 97(19): 10601 - 10606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 by The MIT Press.