HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Panzeri, S. Articles by Rolls, E. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Panzeri, S. Articles by Rolls, E. T.

On Decoding the Responses of a Population of Neurons from Short Time Windows

Neural Systems Group, Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, U.K.

Alessandro Treves

SISSA—Programme in Neuroscience, 34013 Trieste, Italy

Simon Schultz

University of Oxford, Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford OX1 3UD, U.K.

Edmund T. Rolls

University of Oxford, Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford OX1 3UD, U.K.

The effectiveness of various stimulus identification (decoding) procedures for extracting the information carried by the responses of a population of neurons to a set of repeatedly presented stimuli is studied analytically, in the limit of short time windows. It is shown that in this limit, the entire information content of the responses can sometimes be decoded, and when this is not the case, the lost information is quantified. In particular, the mutual information extracted by taking into account only the most likely stimulus in each trial turns out to be, if not equal, much closer to the true value than that calculated from all the probabilities that each of the possible stimuli in the set was the actual one. The relation between the mutual information extracted by decoding and the percentage of correct stimulus decodings is also derived analytically in the same limit, showing that the metric content index can be estimated reliably from a few cells recorded from brief periods. Computer simulations as well as the activity of real neurons recorded in the primate hippocampus serve to confirm these results and illustrate the utility and limitations of the approach.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Scaglione, G. Foffani, G. Scannella, S. Cerutti, and K. A. Moxon Mutual Information Expansion for Studying the Role of Correlations in Population Codes: How Important Are Autocorrelations? Neural Comput., November 1, 2008; 20(11): 2662 - 2695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Pawlas, L. B. Klebanov, M. Prokop, and P. Lansky Parameters of Spike Trains Observed in a Short Time Window Neural Comput., May 1, 2008; 20(5): 1325 - 1343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Ernst, D. Rotermund, and K. Pawelzik Efficient Computation Based on Stochastic Spikes Neural Comput., May 1, 2007; 19(5): 1313 - 1343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. B. Christianson and J. L. Pena Noise reduction of coincidence detector output by the inferior colliculus of the barn owl. J. Neurosci., May 31, 2006; 26(22): 5948 - 5954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. E. Latham and S. Nirenberg Synergy, Redundancy, and Independence in Population Codes, Revisited J. Neurosci., May 25, 2005; 25(21): 5195 - 5206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. C. Osborne, W. Bialek, and S. G. Lisberger Time Course of Information about Motion Direction in Visual Area MT of Macaque Monkeys J. Neurosci., March 31, 2004; 24(13): 3210 - 3222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Nirenberg and P. E. Latham Decoding neuronal spike trains: How important are correlations? PNAS, June 10, 2003; 100(12): 7348 - 7353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Nakahara and S.-i. Amari Information-Geometric Measure for Neural Spikes Neural Comput., October 1, 2002; 14(10): 2269 - 2316. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. Bethge, D. Rotermund, and K. Pawelzik Optimal Short-Term Population Coding: When Fisher Information Fails Neural Comput., October 1, 2002; 14(10): 2317 - 2351. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				I. Samengo Information Loss in an Optimal Maximum Likelihood Decoding Neural Comput., April 1, 2002; 14(4): 771 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Wilke and C. W. Eurich Representational Accuracy of Stochastic Neural Populations Neural Comput., January 1, 2002; 14(1): 155 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Van Rullen and S. J. Thorpe Rate Coding Versus Temporal Order Coding: What the Retinal Ganglion Cells Tell the Visual Cortex Neural Comput., June 1, 2001; 13(6): 1255 - 1283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. T. Rolls and T. Milward A Model of Invariant Object Recognition in the Visual System: Learning Rules, Activation Functions, Lateral Inhibition, and Information-Based Performance Measures Neural Comput., November 1, 2000; 12(11): 2547 - 2572. [Abstract] [Full Text]