Neural Comp. Sign up for ETOCS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hush, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hush, D. R.
(Neural Computation. 1999;11:1249-1260.)
© 1999 The MIT Press


Letter

Training a Sigmoidal Node Is Hard

Don R. Hush

Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, U.S.A.

This article proves that the task of computing near–optimal weights for sigmoidal nodes under the L1 regression norm is NP–Hard. For the special case where the sigmoid is piecewise linear, we prove a slightly stronger result: that computing the optimal weights is NP–Hard. These results parallel that for the one–node pattern recognition problem—that determining the optimal weights for a threshold logic node is also intractable. Our results have important consequences for constructive algorithms that build a regression model one node at a time. It suggests that although such methods are (in principle) capable of producing efficient size representations (Barron, 1993; Jones, 1992), finding such representations may be computationally intractable. These results holds only in the deterministic sense; that is, they do not exclude the possibility that such representations may be found efficiently with high probability. In fact it motivates the use of heuristic or randomized algorithms for this problem.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
J. Sima
Training a Single Sigmoidal Neuron Is Hard
Neural Comput., November 1, 2002; 14(11): 2709 - 2728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 by The MIT Press.